<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 939 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246717</link>
    <description>The judgment by Ms. Archana Wadhwa of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the availability of cenvat credit for welding electrodes used in fabricating and installing capital goods. The court held that welding electrodes essential for fabricating storage tanks and new machinery platforms qualified as modvatable capital goods. The demand for credit availed between January 2006 to October 2006 was deemed barred by limitation as there was no evidence of malafide intentions. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:44:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 939 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246717</link>
      <description>The judgment by Ms. Archana Wadhwa of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the availability of cenvat credit for welding electrodes used in fabricating and installing capital goods. The court held that welding electrodes essential for fabricating storage tanks and new machinery platforms qualified as modvatable capital goods. The demand for credit availed between January 2006 to October 2006 was deemed barred by limitation as there was no evidence of malafide intentions. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>