<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 911 - CESTAT  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246689</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeals, reducing the redemption fine and penalties imposed on the appellants. Duty became payable as per the sustained adjudication, with adjustments made to fines and penalties based on the doctrine of proportionality. The judgment concluded with the pronouncement of orders in open court, outlining adjustments and decisions made based on the detailed analysis of the issues involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:40:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 911 - CESTAT  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246689</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeals, reducing the redemption fine and penalties imposed on the appellants. Duty became payable as per the sustained adjudication, with adjustments made to fines and penalties based on the doctrine of proportionality. The judgment concluded with the pronouncement of orders in open court, outlining adjustments and decisions made based on the detailed analysis of the issues involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>