https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246684 The judgment upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision to deny remission on molasses loss, citing high loss percentage without adequate explanation or evidence from the Appellant. The Appellant failed to challenge the calculation method effectively, leading to confirmation of excise duty demand with penalty reduced to 25%. The court emphasized the need for substantial evidence and effective challenges in cases involving remission applications and excise duty demands for a fair outcome. Appellant directed to pay reduced penalty and duty within 30 days, highlighting the importance of presenting a strong case in such matters. en-us Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:40:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246684 The judgment upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision to deny remission on molasses loss, citing high loss percentage without adequate explanation or evidence from the Appellant. The Appellant failed to challenge the calculation method effectively, leading to confirmation of excise duty demand with penalty reduced to 25%. The court emphasized the need for substantial evidence and effective challenges in cases involving remission applications and excise duty demands for a fair outcome. Appellant directed to pay reduced penalty and duty within 30 days, highlighting the importance of presenting a strong case in such matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246684