<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1035 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246683</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit is admissible for Special Additional Duty actually paid on imported goods where the customs assessment accepted that payment and remained unchallenged. A later Revenue claim that an exemption applied does not by itself justify denying credit, particularly where the exemption entry for raw wool did not clearly cover imported scoured wool. Denial would allow retention of the duty while withholding corresponding credit. Extended limitation cannot apply where credit availment was disclosed in statutory records and returns and there is no suppression or misstatement intended to evade duty. The demand to reverse credit is therefore unsustainable and time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:40:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1035 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246683</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit is admissible for Special Additional Duty actually paid on imported goods where the customs assessment accepted that payment and remained unchallenged. A later Revenue claim that an exemption applied does not by itself justify denying credit, particularly where the exemption entry for raw wool did not clearly cover imported scoured wool. Denial would allow retention of the duty while withholding corresponding credit. Extended limitation cannot apply where credit availment was disclosed in statutory records and returns and there is no suppression or misstatement intended to evade duty. The demand to reverse credit is therefore unsustainable and time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>