https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246670 The appeal challenging the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) directing deposit of duty demand under the Central Excise Act was dismissed by the CESTAT. The Hon'ble High Court's order did not address the appealability of the impugned order, allowing the appellant to withdraw the writ petition and approach the Tribunal. CESTAT held that since the order was under Section 35F, not 35A, the appeal was not maintainable under Section 35B. The CESTAT's analysis emphasized the specific applicability of Section 35F, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:38:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246670 The appeal challenging the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) directing deposit of duty demand under the Central Excise Act was dismissed by the CESTAT. The Hon'ble High Court's order did not address the appealability of the impugned order, allowing the appellant to withdraw the writ petition and approach the Tribunal. CESTAT held that since the order was under Section 35F, not 35A, the appeal was not maintainable under Section 35B. The CESTAT's analysis emphasized the specific applicability of Section 35F, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246670