<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1013 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246661</link>
    <description>The appellate authority allowed the appeal of the party regarding liability for destroyed capital goods on which CENVAT credit was availed, citing precedents indicating the absence of a provision for demanding CENVAT credit on destroyed capital goods. The Department&#039;s appeal to the Karnataka High Court was dismissed based on the High Court&#039;s interpretation and precedent in a similar case, affirming the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:38:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1013 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246661</link>
      <description>The appellate authority allowed the appeal of the party regarding liability for destroyed capital goods on which CENVAT credit was availed, citing precedents indicating the absence of a provision for demanding CENVAT credit on destroyed capital goods. The Department&#039;s appeal to the Karnataka High Court was dismissed based on the High Court&#039;s interpretation and precedent in a similar case, affirming the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>