https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246656 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application seeking rectification of mistakes in the Final Order, which denied exemption for specific intravenous fluid formulations. The Tribunal upheld its decision that intravenous fluids with therapeutic value would not qualify for duty exemption. It clarified that if the appellant's formulations were solely for replenishment purposes without therapeutic components, exemption could be claimed through excise authorities without rectification. The Tribunal also noted that matters related to Cenvat credit and cum-duty benefit were beyond the scope of the remand order and did not require directions in the Final Order. en-us Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:38:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246656 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application seeking rectification of mistakes in the Final Order, which denied exemption for specific intravenous fluid formulations. The Tribunal upheld its decision that intravenous fluids with therapeutic value would not qualify for duty exemption. It clarified that if the appellant's formulations were solely for replenishment purposes without therapeutic components, exemption could be claimed through excise authorities without rectification. The Tribunal also noted that matters related to Cenvat credit and cum-duty benefit were beyond the scope of the remand order and did not require directions in the Final Order. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246656