<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1004 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246652</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that converting HDPE fabrics into HDPE bags by stitching amounts to manufacturing under Heading No. 3923.90, attracting Central Excise duty. The demand against the appellant was not barred by limitation as their failure to disclose information constituted suppression of facts, justifying the longer limitation period for duty recovery and penalties under Section 11AC. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the duty imposition and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:37:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1004 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246652</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that converting HDPE fabrics into HDPE bags by stitching amounts to manufacturing under Heading No. 3923.90, attracting Central Excise duty. The demand against the appellant was not barred by limitation as their failure to disclose information constituted suppression of facts, justifying the longer limitation period for duty recovery and penalties under Section 11AC. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the duty imposition and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>