<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 948 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246644</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision of the ld. Commissioner (Appeals), ruling in favor of the respondent regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on inputs. The Tribunal found that the respondent had taken reasonable steps as required by the rules and that recovery should be made from the input supplier in case of default, allowing the respondent to retain the credit availed. The cross-objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:37:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 948 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246644</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision of the ld. Commissioner (Appeals), ruling in favor of the respondent regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on inputs. The Tribunal found that the respondent had taken reasonable steps as required by the rules and that recovery should be made from the input supplier in case of default, allowing the respondent to retain the credit availed. The cross-objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>