<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 927 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246623</link>
    <description>Storage of molasses in unapproved katcha pits inside the factory premises did not amount to removal from the factory for duty purposes. The molasses were shifted within the factory and duty was paid when they were later cleared from the premises, so the transfer itself was not a contravention on the facts found by the appellate authority. The demand and penalty were therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:35:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 927 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246623</link>
      <description>Storage of molasses in unapproved katcha pits inside the factory premises did not amount to removal from the factory for duty purposes. The molasses were shifted within the factory and duty was paid when they were later cleared from the premises, so the transfer itself was not a contravention on the facts found by the appellate authority. The demand and penalty were therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>