<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 926 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246622</link>
    <description>Alleged shortages of raw material or unaccounted finished goods, without evidence of clandestine clearance or removal, do not by themselves justify duty demand or major penalty. The demand and connected penalty on the claimed raw-material shortage were not sustainable because no material showed actual clearance, utilisation in clandestine manufacture, or duty evasion. For the finished goods, confiscation-related duty demand and major penalty were also not sustainable in the absence of proof of clandestine removal and where the goods were not redeemed, although a token penalty survived for failure to maintain proper statutory records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 926 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246622</link>
      <description>Alleged shortages of raw material or unaccounted finished goods, without evidence of clandestine clearance or removal, do not by themselves justify duty demand or major penalty. The demand and connected penalty on the claimed raw-material shortage were not sustainable because no material showed actual clearance, utilisation in clandestine manufacture, or duty evasion. For the finished goods, confiscation-related duty demand and major penalty were also not sustainable in the absence of proof of clandestine removal and where the goods were not redeemed, although a token penalty survived for failure to maintain proper statutory records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>