https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246617 The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority's decision, ruling that adjusting rebate claims against non-existent government dues without confirmed demands was not legally permissible. The Tribunal emphasized that such adjustment was premature, especially when the previous order was under appeal and an unconditional stay had been granted by the Tribunal. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeals, affirming the correctness of the decision to grant the sanctioned rebate if no stay was obtained against the Tribunal's order. en-us Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 May 2013 15:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246617 The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority's decision, ruling that adjusting rebate claims against non-existent government dues without confirmed demands was not legally permissible. The Tribunal emphasized that such adjustment was premature, especially when the previous order was under appeal and an unconditional stay had been granted by the Tribunal. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeals, affirming the correctness of the decision to grant the sanctioned rebate if no stay was obtained against the Tribunal's order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246617