https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246614 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the abatement allowed for the closure periods spanning over two consecutive months, including 1st April 2010 and 1st May 2010, under Rule 10 of the Pan Masala Packing Machine Rules. The judgment clarified that abatement can be granted for any continuous period of 15 days or more, irrespective of whether it falls within a single calendar month, emphasizing specific conditions such as intimation to authorities and sealing of packing machines. en-us Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:34:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246614 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, upholding the abatement allowed for the closure periods spanning over two consecutive months, including 1st April 2010 and 1st May 2010, under Rule 10 of the Pan Masala Packing Machine Rules. The judgment clarified that abatement can be granted for any continuous period of 15 days or more, irrespective of whether it falls within a single calendar month, emphasizing specific conditions such as intimation to authorities and sealing of packing machines. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246614