<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 880 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of appeal due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit order, despite the Appellants&#039; argument that compliance entitled them to restoration. The Tribunal relied on a High Court judgment where appeal restoration was denied under similar circumstances, emphasizing the importance of legal precedent in appeal restoration cases. The judgment also highlighted the consequences of challenging Tribunal orders in higher courts, as the dismissal of the appeal by the High Court was a significant factor in rejecting the application for appeal restoration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:34:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 880 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of appeal due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit order, despite the Appellants&#039; argument that compliance entitled them to restoration. The Tribunal relied on a High Court judgment where appeal restoration was denied under similar circumstances, emphasizing the importance of legal precedent in appeal restoration cases. The judgment also highlighted the consequences of challenging Tribunal orders in higher courts, as the dismissal of the appeal by the High Court was a significant factor in rejecting the application for appeal restoration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>