<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 877 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246608</link>
    <description>A prima facie case was found for waiver and stay of demands arising from denial of CENVAT credit on capital goods and duty on inputs cleared as such. The proviso to Notification No. 30/2004-C.E., read with the corrigendum, was applied to hold that the bar operated only where credit on inputs had been taken under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002. As no CENVAT credit on inputs was disputed, and the notification did not prohibit credit on capital goods, the capital goods demand was found prima facie unsustainable. The demand on inputs cleared as such was also held prima facie unsustainable, and the adjudged dues were stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:34:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 877 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246608</link>
      <description>A prima facie case was found for waiver and stay of demands arising from denial of CENVAT credit on capital goods and duty on inputs cleared as such. The proviso to Notification No. 30/2004-C.E., read with the corrigendum, was applied to hold that the bar operated only where credit on inputs had been taken under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002. As no CENVAT credit on inputs was disputed, and the notification did not prohibit credit on capital goods, the capital goods demand was found prima facie unsustainable. The demand on inputs cleared as such was also held prima facie unsustainable, and the adjudged dues were stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>