https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246607 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellant for shortages of various materials, emphasizing the lack of conclusive proof through actual weighment. The appellant's acceptance of shortages in a statement was not deemed sufficient evidence of clandestine removal. Precedents requiring actual weighment to establish shortages were cited, leading to the Tribunal granting relief to the appellant due to the absence of concrete evidence supporting the duty demand based on visual estimations alone. en-us Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:34:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246607 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellant for shortages of various materials, emphasizing the lack of conclusive proof through actual weighment. The appellant's acceptance of shortages in a statement was not deemed sufficient evidence of clandestine removal. Precedents requiring actual weighment to establish shortages were cited, leading to the Tribunal granting relief to the appellant due to the absence of concrete evidence supporting the duty demand based on visual estimations alone. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246607