<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 869 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246600</link>
    <description>The appeal involved the denial of CENVAT credit on Goods Transport Agency Service (GTA service) used for outward transportation of final products. The High Court, referencing a previous case, ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that outward transportation of goods from the factory qualifies as an input service before 01/04/2008. This decision emphasizes the importance of understanding key terms in tax credit claims, reliance on judicial precedents, and the impact of legal interpretations on case outcomes. The appeal was allowed based on the High Court&#039;s ruling, highlighting the significance of legal consistency in resolving disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:34:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 869 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246600</link>
      <description>The appeal involved the denial of CENVAT credit on Goods Transport Agency Service (GTA service) used for outward transportation of final products. The High Court, referencing a previous case, ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that outward transportation of goods from the factory qualifies as an input service before 01/04/2008. This decision emphasizes the importance of understanding key terms in tax credit claims, reliance on judicial precedents, and the impact of legal interpretations on case outcomes. The appeal was allowed based on the High Court&#039;s ruling, highlighting the significance of legal consistency in resolving disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>