<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 859 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no evidence linking the appellant to clandestine clearance of goods or failure to pass on Cenvat credit. The appellant&#039;s legal transactions were supported by the required documentation, and statements from co-accused were deemed insufficient to establish liability. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed by Revenue authorities, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:32:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 859 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no evidence linking the appellant to clandestine clearance of goods or failure to pass on Cenvat credit. The appellant&#039;s legal transactions were supported by the required documentation, and statements from co-accused were deemed insufficient to establish liability. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed by Revenue authorities, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>