<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 862 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246584</link>
    <description>The court granted the stay application regarding the transfer of unutilized Cenvat credit from closed manufacturing units to a surviving unit. The judge found that the application for transfer was made after surrendering the registration of the closed factories, making it ineligible under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Department&#039;s argument that the Commissioner&#039;s decision violated Rule 10(3) was upheld, leading to the stay of the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:32:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 862 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246584</link>
      <description>The court granted the stay application regarding the transfer of unutilized Cenvat credit from closed manufacturing units to a surviving unit. The judge found that the application for transfer was made after surrendering the registration of the closed factories, making it ineligible under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Department&#039;s argument that the Commissioner&#039;s decision violated Rule 10(3) was upheld, leading to the stay of the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>