<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 857 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246579</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of the demand for the wrongly availed cenvat credit with interest but set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant. The judgment emphasized that when an assessee promptly rectifies an error upon discovery without waiting for formal proceedings, penalty imposition may not be justified, even in cases of incorrect availing of cenvat credit. The decision underscored the significance of voluntary rectification and the absence of suppression or misstatement in such circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:32:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 857 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246579</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of the demand for the wrongly availed cenvat credit with interest but set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant. The judgment emphasized that when an assessee promptly rectifies an error upon discovery without waiting for formal proceedings, penalty imposition may not be justified, even in cases of incorrect availing of cenvat credit. The decision underscored the significance of voluntary rectification and the absence of suppression or misstatement in such circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>