<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 845 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246567</link>
    <description>Entitlement to the reduced-duty entry in Serial No. 93 of Notification No. 4/2006-C.E. was treated as prima facie available for paper and paper boards manufactured by the appellant, because the notification text supported discharge of duty at 8% on the appellant&#039;s claimed basis. Revenue&#039;s objection that the appellant should instead have used the exemption for the first clearance of 3,500 MT was not accepted at the interim stage. On that footing, the appellant made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery of the penalty amount was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:31:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 845 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246567</link>
      <description>Entitlement to the reduced-duty entry in Serial No. 93 of Notification No. 4/2006-C.E. was treated as prima facie available for paper and paper boards manufactured by the appellant, because the notification text supported discharge of duty at 8% on the appellant&#039;s claimed basis. Revenue&#039;s objection that the appellant should instead have used the exemption for the first clearance of 3,500 MT was not accepted at the interim stage. On that footing, the appellant made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery of the penalty amount was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>