<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 842 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246564</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and provided consequential relief in a case where the rejection of a refund claim based on unjust enrichment principle was challenged. The Tribunal held that unjust enrichment provisions do not apply when the refund relates to credit of duty on excisable goods used as inputs for exported goods, citing precedents from the High Court of Gujarat and the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 842 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246564</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and provided consequential relief in a case where the rejection of a refund claim based on unjust enrichment principle was challenged. The Tribunal held that unjust enrichment provisions do not apply when the refund relates to credit of duty on excisable goods used as inputs for exported goods, citing precedents from the High Court of Gujarat and the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>