<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 839 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that once manufacturers settled their liabilities under Section 11A(1A) of the Central Excise Act, penalties on the respondents should be set aside. The Tribunal interpreted that the provisions benefit all parties mentioned in the notice, not just the direct assessee who paid the duty, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal rejected Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that proceedings against all parties should conclude after the manufacturers fulfill their obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:31:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 839 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that once manufacturers settled their liabilities under Section 11A(1A) of the Central Excise Act, penalties on the respondents should be set aside. The Tribunal interpreted that the provisions benefit all parties mentioned in the notice, not just the direct assessee who paid the duty, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal rejected Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that proceedings against all parties should conclude after the manufacturers fulfill their obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>