https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246558 The appellant, engaged in sugar manufacturing, sought waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for adjudged dues related to CENVAT credit denial and penalties. The Tribunal upheld the appellant's claim, emphasizing that bagasse, considered waste and not consciously manufactured, did not qualify as excisable goods. The appellant's compliance with reversing the credit before the show cause notice entitled them to the relief sought. The order granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for both appeal numbers based on previous Tribunal decisions upheld by the Supreme Court. en-us Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:30:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246558 The appellant, engaged in sugar manufacturing, sought waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for adjudged dues related to CENVAT credit denial and penalties. The Tribunal upheld the appellant's claim, emphasizing that bagasse, considered waste and not consciously manufactured, did not qualify as excisable goods. The appellant's compliance with reversing the credit before the show cause notice entitled them to the relief sought. The order granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for both appeal numbers based on previous Tribunal decisions upheld by the Supreme Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246558