<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 830 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246552</link>
    <description>A mobile telescopic tower mounted on a duty-paid chassis was treated, on a prima facie basis, as a special purpose motor vehicle under Heading 8705 rather than as goods classifiable under Chapter 73. That classification supported eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E., and the strong prima facie case justified interim protection. The pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:29:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 830 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246552</link>
      <description>A mobile telescopic tower mounted on a duty-paid chassis was treated, on a prima facie basis, as a special purpose motor vehicle under Heading 8705 rather than as goods classifiable under Chapter 73. That classification supported eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E., and the strong prima facie case justified interim protection. The pre-deposit of duty, interest and penalty was waived and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>