<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 827 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246549</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant&#039;s failure to demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal, leading to the application for condonation of delay and the appeal being deemed time-barred. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely compliance with legal procedures and highlighted the need for a genuine and reasonable cause for condonation of delay. The appellant&#039;s reliance on various case laws was deemed inapplicable as the Tribunal found the facts of those cases to be distinct from the present matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:29:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 827 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246549</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant&#039;s failure to demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal, leading to the application for condonation of delay and the appeal being deemed time-barred. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely compliance with legal procedures and highlighted the need for a genuine and reasonable cause for condonation of delay. The appellant&#039;s reliance on various case laws was deemed inapplicable as the Tribunal found the facts of those cases to be distinct from the present matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>