<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 824 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246546</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s eligibility for cenvat credit on courier services, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Commissioner&#039;s reliance on tribunal decisions and lack of evidence from the Revenue to refute the respondent&#039;s claim supported the decision. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the demand, interest, and penalty imposed post CERA audit findings, providing relief to the respondent by not confirming the amount, emphasizing the need for evidence and legal precedents in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 824 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246546</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s eligibility for cenvat credit on courier services, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Commissioner&#039;s reliance on tribunal decisions and lack of evidence from the Revenue to refute the respondent&#039;s claim supported the decision. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the demand, interest, and penalty imposed post CERA audit findings, providing relief to the respondent by not confirming the amount, emphasizing the need for evidence and legal precedents in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>