<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 842 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246535</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty and penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority, amounting to Rs. 3,16,808/-, due to non-inclusion of third-party inspection charges in duty calculation. The appellant failed to provide evidence supporting their claim that these charges were client-requested and not mandatory. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 25,000/- and produce necessary documents for further consideration. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a detailed examination based on the documents provided, emphasizing the importance of evidence and procedural fairness in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:28:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 842 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246535</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty and penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority, amounting to Rs. 3,16,808/-, due to non-inclusion of third-party inspection charges in duty calculation. The appellant failed to provide evidence supporting their claim that these charges were client-requested and not mandatory. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 25,000/- and produce necessary documents for further consideration. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a detailed examination based on the documents provided, emphasizing the importance of evidence and procedural fairness in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>