<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 838 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246530</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that excise duty exemption is available if necessary certificates are produced, even if submitted post-clearance. The matter was remitted for certificate verification. The demand for M/s. Oil India Ltd. and M/s. Jindal Power Ltd. was upheld with interest and penalties, offering an option to pay 25% of the duty amount as a penalty within 30 days. Appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:27:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 838 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246530</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that excise duty exemption is available if necessary certificates are produced, even if submitted post-clearance. The matter was remitted for certificate verification. The demand for M/s. Oil India Ltd. and M/s. Jindal Power Ltd. was upheld with interest and penalties, offering an option to pay 25% of the duty amount as a penalty within 30 days. Appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>