<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 828 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision allowing the respondent to claim cenvat credit for service tax paid by Custom House Agents and Clearing and Forwarding Agents for services related to the export of goods. The Tribunal relied on its previous decisions and established legal principles to support the eligibility of the respondent for the credit. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the legality of the initial decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:27:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 828 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision allowing the respondent to claim cenvat credit for service tax paid by Custom House Agents and Clearing and Forwarding Agents for services related to the export of goods. The Tribunal relied on its previous decisions and established legal principles to support the eligibility of the respondent for the credit. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the legality of the initial decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>