<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 826 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246518</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s eligibility to claim cenvat credit for service tax paid by Custom House Agents and Clearing and Forwarding Agents for services related to exporting goods. Relying on established precedents, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the first appellate authority&#039;s decision. The ruling emphasized the consistent interpretation of the law by the Tribunal in similar cases, underscoring the significance of precedent in determining eligibility for cenvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:27:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 826 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246518</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s eligibility to claim cenvat credit for service tax paid by Custom House Agents and Clearing and Forwarding Agents for services related to exporting goods. Relying on established precedents, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the first appellate authority&#039;s decision. The ruling emphasized the consistent interpretation of the law by the Tribunal in similar cases, underscoring the significance of precedent in determining eligibility for cenvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>