https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246492 The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the respondent's entitlement to obtain multiple registration certificates for different business activities within the same campus under Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellant's compliance with requirements and lack of evidence of malafide intent supported this decision. As a result, the Revenue's appeal challenging the multiple registrations granted to the respondent was dismissed due to the absence of errors in the Commissioner's order. en-us Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:25:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246492 The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the respondent's entitlement to obtain multiple registration certificates for different business activities within the same campus under Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellant's compliance with requirements and lack of evidence of malafide intent supported this decision. As a result, the Revenue's appeal challenging the multiple registrations granted to the respondent was dismissed due to the absence of errors in the Commissioner's order. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246492