<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 735 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246485</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the assessment of goods under the Central Excise Act. The issue revolved around whether the goods should be assessed under Section 4 or Section 4A of the Act. The Tribunal, relying on previous legal precedents and a Supreme Court judgment, concluded that the goods should be assessed under Section 4, supporting the appellant&#039;s position. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:24:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 735 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246485</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the assessment of goods under the Central Excise Act. The issue revolved around whether the goods should be assessed under Section 4 or Section 4A of the Act. The Tribunal, relying on previous legal precedents and a Supreme Court judgment, concluded that the goods should be assessed under Section 4, supporting the appellant&#039;s position. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>