https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246477 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE due to the appellant's failure to comply with the predeposit order, leading to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appellant's attempt to seek modification of the Stay Order citing financial hardships, the Tribunal found no prima facie case for such modification, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and fulfilling predeposit obligations as mandated by law. en-us Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:24:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246477 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE due to the appellant's failure to comply with the predeposit order, leading to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appellant's attempt to seek modification of the Stay Order citing financial hardships, the Tribunal found no prima facie case for such modification, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and fulfilling predeposit obligations as mandated by law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246477