<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 552 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246474</link>
    <description>Penalty on a transporter under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules was held unsustainable where the goods were received in sealed and packed condition and transport documents were prepared on the consignor&#039;s declaration. The Tribunal observed that a transporter is not required to act as an excise officer or independently verify whether goods are duty-paid before carriage. It also noted that no duty-confirmation proceedings had been initiated against the manufacturer despite the allegation that the goods were non-duty-paid. On that basis, the penalty against the transporter was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:23:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 552 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246474</link>
      <description>Penalty on a transporter under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules was held unsustainable where the goods were received in sealed and packed condition and transport documents were prepared on the consignor&#039;s declaration. The Tribunal observed that a transporter is not required to act as an excise officer or independently verify whether goods are duty-paid before carriage. It also noted that no duty-confirmation proceedings had been initiated against the manufacturer despite the allegation that the goods were non-duty-paid. On that basis, the penalty against the transporter was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>