<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 542 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246464</link>
    <description>The judge partially allowed both appeals, reducing the penalties imposed by the Commissioner (Appeal) significantly based on the considerations of proportionality and legal interpretations regarding duty payment defaults and penalty applicability under Rule 25(a).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 542 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246464</link>
      <description>The judge partially allowed both appeals, reducing the penalties imposed by the Commissioner (Appeal) significantly based on the considerations of proportionality and legal interpretations regarding duty payment defaults and penalty applicability under Rule 25(a).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>