<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 540 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246457</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal as in-fructuous. The appellant&#039;s rebate claim was allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals) under the condition that no refund would be granted. As the appellant had already received the rebate claim per the Govt. of India&#039;s order, the original authority&#039;s potential refund was deemed irrelevant. The Tribunal emphasized the fulfillment of the rebate claim, rendering the Revenue&#039;s appeal unnecessary and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:22:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 540 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246457</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal as in-fructuous. The appellant&#039;s rebate claim was allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals) under the condition that no refund would be granted. As the appellant had already received the rebate claim per the Govt. of India&#039;s order, the original authority&#039;s potential refund was deemed irrelevant. The Tribunal emphasized the fulfillment of the rebate claim, rendering the Revenue&#039;s appeal unnecessary and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>