https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246456 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, citing precedent and granting consequential relief. The decision emphasized the applicability of Rule 6(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules to clearances of excisable goods to SEZ developers without payment of duty, waiving the conditions of other sub-rules of Rule 6. This judgment clarifies the interpretation and application of Rule 6 in such cases, underscoring the importance of compliance with specified conditions and the impact of relevant precedents on the final decision. en-us Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:22:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246456 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, citing precedent and granting consequential relief. The decision emphasized the applicability of Rule 6(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules to clearances of excisable goods to SEZ developers without payment of duty, waiving the conditions of other sub-rules of Rule 6. This judgment clarifies the interpretation and application of Rule 6 in such cases, underscoring the importance of compliance with specified conditions and the impact of relevant precedents on the final decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246456