<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 536 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246453</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants, waiving the pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the marketability of the goods in question, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence and market inquiry in determining the capability of goods to be bought and sold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:22:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 536 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246453</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants, waiving the pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the marketability of the goods in question, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence and market inquiry in determining the capability of goods to be bought and sold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>