https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246452 The appellant's claim for a refund of service tax paid on various services related to exported goods was rejected by the court. The rejection was based on factors such as insufficient details on invoices, notes indicating the service receiver should bear the tax burden, and failure to provide evidence of payment to the government. Despite multiple opportunities, the appellant failed to provide substantial submissions or supporting documents. The judge found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it. en-us Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:22:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246452 The appellant's claim for a refund of service tax paid on various services related to exported goods was rejected by the court. The rejection was based on factors such as insufficient details on invoices, notes indicating the service receiver should bear the tax burden, and failure to provide evidence of payment to the government. Despite multiple opportunities, the appellant failed to provide substantial submissions or supporting documents. The judge found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246452