<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 529 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246446</link>
    <description>Duty paid on clearance of re-conditioned imported machines was treated as substantive reversal of the Cenvat credit earlier availed, because the duty paid exceeded the credit taken. Applying revenue neutrality, the Tribunal held that a separate demand for reversal of the same credit was not sustainable where the duty discharged on clearance equalled or exceeded the credit availed. The result was that the reversal demand failed and the assessee&#039;s position was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:22:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 529 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246446</link>
      <description>Duty paid on clearance of re-conditioned imported machines was treated as substantive reversal of the Cenvat credit earlier availed, because the duty paid exceeded the credit taken. Applying revenue neutrality, the Tribunal held that a separate demand for reversal of the same credit was not sustainable where the duty discharged on clearance equalled or exceeded the credit availed. The result was that the reversal demand failed and the assessee&#039;s position was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>