<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 517 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246434</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE dismissed the department&#039;s appeal in a valuation dispute over goods supplied to Sigma Marine and Protective coatings India Ltd. The Tribunal held that notional interest on advances should not be included in the assessable value of the goods. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision was upheld, citing relevant case law that no nexus between the advances and the assessable value had been established. The duty paid by the respondent was deemed sufficient, and no further duty amount was required to be paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:21:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 517 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246434</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE dismissed the department&#039;s appeal in a valuation dispute over goods supplied to Sigma Marine and Protective coatings India Ltd. The Tribunal held that notional interest on advances should not be included in the assessable value of the goods. The Commissioner (Appeals) decision was upheld, citing relevant case law that no nexus between the advances and the assessable value had been established. The duty paid by the respondent was deemed sufficient, and no further duty amount was required to be paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>