<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 512 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration of appeals rejected by the Committee on Disputes (COD) following the Supreme Court&#039;s recall of COD orders in the ECIL case. The appellants successfully argued for the revival of their appeal rights under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, emphasizing that the COD&#039;s restrictions were nullified by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Tribunal granted a waiver of the pre-deposit condition for interest and penalty, enabling the appeals to proceed without immediate payment obligations. The decision aimed to uphold justice and legal procedures in light of the COD&#039;s inefficiencies and delays in dispute resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 512 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration of appeals rejected by the Committee on Disputes (COD) following the Supreme Court&#039;s recall of COD orders in the ECIL case. The appellants successfully argued for the revival of their appeal rights under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, emphasizing that the COD&#039;s restrictions were nullified by the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Tribunal granted a waiver of the pre-deposit condition for interest and penalty, enabling the appeals to proceed without immediate payment obligations. The decision aimed to uphold justice and legal procedures in light of the COD&#039;s inefficiencies and delays in dispute resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>