https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246427 Pre-deposit waiver was refused because, on a prima facie reading of Notification No. 17/2007-CE dated 01.03.07, the appellant was not found entitled to abatement. As the claimed abatement did not appear available, the direction to deposit the confirmed duty liability before the appeal was heard was treated as justified. The requirement to deposit the entire duty amount was therefore upheld. en-us Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:20:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246427 Pre-deposit waiver was refused because, on a prima facie reading of Notification No. 17/2007-CE dated 01.03.07, the appellant was not found entitled to abatement. As the claimed abatement did not appear available, the direction to deposit the confirmed duty liability before the appeal was heard was treated as justified. The requirement to deposit the entire duty amount was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246427