<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 364 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246416</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty amounting to Rs. 3,51,26,013 in a case involving duty on petroleum products in BPT and Pirpau pipelines. The Revenue&#039;s demand was based on the withdrawal of duty-free removal facility post-September 2004. The applicant successfully argued that the BPT pipeline did not belong to them, absolving them of duty liability, and that the products in the Pirpau pipeline were part of their inventory stock, cleared subsequently on payment of duty. The Tribunal found a strong prima facie case in the applicant&#039;s favor, granting the waiver and staying recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:19:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 364 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246416</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the applicant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty amounting to Rs. 3,51,26,013 in a case involving duty on petroleum products in BPT and Pirpau pipelines. The Revenue&#039;s demand was based on the withdrawal of duty-free removal facility post-September 2004. The applicant successfully argued that the BPT pipeline did not belong to them, absolving them of duty liability, and that the products in the Pirpau pipeline were part of their inventory stock, cleared subsequently on payment of duty. The Tribunal found a strong prima facie case in the applicant&#039;s favor, granting the waiver and staying recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>