<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 360 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246412</link>
    <description>Job work clearances of fabrics had to be valued on the Ujagar Prints cost-plus basis, namely raw material cost, job charges and job worker&#039;s profit; losses and notional interest on interest-free loans could not be loaded into assessable value, and any departmental doubt required verification by a Cost Accountant. Clearances to group companies for captive consumption had to be valued under Rule 8 on CAS-IV cost of production, and the Commissioner could not reject the costing standard or add notional interest without fresh statutory verification. The service tax demand on C&amp;F activity also required a finding whether the assessee was the service provider or only the recipient. The order was set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:14:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 360 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246412</link>
      <description>Job work clearances of fabrics had to be valued on the Ujagar Prints cost-plus basis, namely raw material cost, job charges and job worker&#039;s profit; losses and notional interest on interest-free loans could not be loaded into assessable value, and any departmental doubt required verification by a Cost Accountant. Clearances to group companies for captive consumption had to be valued under Rule 8 on CAS-IV cost of production, and the Commissioner could not reject the costing standard or add notional interest without fresh statutory verification. The service tax demand on C&amp;F activity also required a finding whether the assessee was the service provider or only the recipient. The order was set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>