https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246411 The appellant sought to dispense with the pre-deposit of interest confirmed against them, citing limitations and referencing relevant case law. The Revenue argued for the mandatory nature of interest payment without the need for a show cause notice. The Tribunal, considering a Division Bench decision, granted an unconditional stay on the interest amount, finding in favor of the appellant. The case delved into the application of limitation and the mandatory nature of interest payment, with references to various legal precedents to support the arguments presented by both parties. en-us Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:14:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246411 The appellant sought to dispense with the pre-deposit of interest confirmed against them, citing limitations and referencing relevant case law. The Revenue argued for the mandatory nature of interest payment without the need for a show cause notice. The Tribunal, considering a Division Bench decision, granted an unconditional stay on the interest amount, finding in favor of the appellant. The case delved into the application of limitation and the mandatory nature of interest payment, with references to various legal precedents to support the arguments presented by both parties. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246411