<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 349 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the duty demand of Rs. 4,06,412/- and imposed an equal penalty on the appellant for retaining 50% of sales tax collected under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. Relying on a previous decision, the Tribunal held that the retained amount did not alter its nature as sales tax payable, as it was adjusted for a capital subsidy. The Tribunal distinguished other cases and emphasized that the sales tax collected should be deemed as sales tax payable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, highlighting the importance of consistent legal interpretation based on established principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:14:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 349 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the duty demand of Rs. 4,06,412/- and imposed an equal penalty on the appellant for retaining 50% of sales tax collected under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. Relying on a previous decision, the Tribunal held that the retained amount did not alter its nature as sales tax payable, as it was adjusted for a capital subsidy. The Tribunal distinguished other cases and emphasized that the sales tax collected should be deemed as sales tax payable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, highlighting the importance of consistent legal interpretation based on established principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>