<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 440 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246398</link>
    <description>The case involved issues of waiver of pre-deposit of duty, confirmation of demand for invalid input invoices, allegations of passing ex parte orders without proper notice, non-compliance with serving notices under Section 37C of the Central Excise Act, and lack of evidence of affixing notices on the notice board. The applicants sought relief due to procedural irregularities, including non-receipt of notices and lack of opportunity for a personal hearing. Ultimately, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:13:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 440 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246398</link>
      <description>The case involved issues of waiver of pre-deposit of duty, confirmation of demand for invalid input invoices, allegations of passing ex parte orders without proper notice, non-compliance with serving notices under Section 37C of the Central Excise Act, and lack of evidence of affixing notices on the notice board. The applicants sought relief due to procedural irregularities, including non-receipt of notices and lack of opportunity for a personal hearing. Ultimately, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>