<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 439 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246397</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the interest on late reversal of Modvat Credit and upheld the interest and reduced penalty imposed on the Appellants for incorrect reversal of Cenvat credit. The penalty was deemed unjustifiable due to oversight of law provisions, leading to its setting aside by the Tribunal. The appeal was partially allowed and partially rejected, with the Tribunal referencing legal provisions and court decisions to support its conclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 439 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246397</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the interest on late reversal of Modvat Credit and upheld the interest and reduced penalty imposed on the Appellants for incorrect reversal of Cenvat credit. The penalty was deemed unjustifiable due to oversight of law provisions, leading to its setting aside by the Tribunal. The appeal was partially allowed and partially rejected, with the Tribunal referencing legal provisions and court decisions to support its conclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>